Study #4: The Woman Caught in Adultery (John 7:53-8:11)
John 7:53-8:11
This week, I thought we could tackle something a little more challenging: the famous story of "the woman caught in adultery." The almost unanimous opinion of most scholars is that this passage is not originally part of John's Gospel. (The footnote on John 7:53 in the NET Bible is quite illuminating on this point.) Recently, when the "Conservative Bible Project" at Conservapedia made news around the country, this passage was one of the more significant ones that those folks found to be "too liberal" to remain in the Bible. And yet, the fact is that the story does remain in most Bibles. The original RSV New Testament relegated it to a foonote, only to restore it to the main text in later editions; several modern translations (including the NET) have some sort of special type, punctuation, or footnote, to indicate the questionable textual support for the pericope. But so far, to my knowledge, no major translation has taken this story out of the Bible altogether (we'll see if Conservapedia's "translation" ever makes it to publication).
So what is it about this story that has so captured Christians' imaginations over the centuries? I can think of several movie adaptations of the Gospels, wherein the story of the woman caught in adultery is a central scene. I'm sure you can picture it: the woman with tears rolling down her face, the leaders with stones in their hands, Jesus doodling in the dirt with his fingertips, and those famous words: "Whoever among you is guiltless may be the first to throw a stone at her." (Or so the NET Bible renders it. I know many of us immediately think "he who is without sin," as the KJV translates the saying.) We can picture quite clearly the men gradually drifting away, perhaps looking sheepish. Then those other famous words: "I do not condemn you either." This was the phrase that seemed to rankle with the Conservapedia folks; the idea that Jesus would be liberal enough to forgive someone of such obvious sin painted a picture of Jesus that was unacceptable to their more conservative viewpoint.
Like the parable of the Prodigal Son, this story seems to offer an ideal opportunity for us to identify with different characters: we can be forgiving like Jesus, hypocritical like the town's leaders, or scared and grateful like the woman herself. Furthermore, many commentators have argued and hypothesized about details of the story that are not explained:
- Where is the man with whom the woman committed the adultery?
- What does Jesus write in the dust? (Such an odd little detail, mentioned twice in the very short passage, and yet, so evocative!)
- Does the woman repent and become a follower of Christ? Does she "go and sin no more"?
The story is so short, so simple, and yet, it says so much about sin, forgiveness, grace, hypocricy, etc.
I would love to hear others' thoughts on this one...
- 9461 reads
-
- Report Abuse

Comments
C'mon folks, lets keep the discussion going!
Submitted by Cory Howell on Fri, 03/05/2010 - 17:13.[ I haven't seen too many comments on my recent posts, and I know that the comments I've made aren't exactly the final word on these subjects!]
A couple more thoughts on this passage:
Other thoughts? Since there are over two dozen people enrolled in this group, I expect that at least one of you has some opinions of your own on this famous story. I'd love to hear from you!
Cory Howell
Nashville, TN
It's not about her, it's about me!
Submitted by Pam K on Thu, 02/24/2011 - 15:43.Cory, I read through your 2 posts about the woman caught in the act and spent some time seeking God about it myself.
1. The first thing that always strikes me is the seeming unfairness of the accused woman versus the missing male. As I was seeking the Lord’s input on this issue last night, this is the Scripture I got--not exactly what I was expecting.
The disciples in John 21:22 were asking why was John was special. My translation of What is that to you would be something similar to: Mind your own business. You have enough sin of your own to be concerned with. Basically what God was saying to me last night was to stop following the issue of why the woman was brought and the man wasn’t and look elsewhere for what He is teaching us.
2. There is another issue, Cory, that you did not question that has always caught my attention: Why did Jesus not ask for the man to be brought to Him before He even addressed the issue? Because of the covenant, in Jewish thinking it is normal for both sides of the story to be presented.
Is it possible that because Jesus had said He did not come to judge, that He did not intend to get into the cause or the blame? His purpose was to bring salvation. Therefore, the forgiveness of sin that He displayed demonstrates Jesus’ determination to stick with God’s agenda. His neither do I condemn you is almost a refusal to act as Judge. He comes as Judge next time.
3. From the time I first became Christian the instruction I received regarding parables is that a parable does not agree in every detail with the Word and ways of the Lord--we are to focus on the main point. But, is this Caught-In-The-Act an actual event or a parable? In your first post you even bring up the parable of the Prodigal Son, suggesting that it should possibly be viewed as a parable. Then using the conservative group’s belief that the event should not even be part of cannon, your post questions if this was actually one of the acts of Jesus.
4. For the last 5 years or so I have been reading the Word with a different perspective. Since I am 66 years old I have spent many decades getting the Word into me. What I am doing now is seeking a more intimate connection with the Lord who wrote that Word. So when I read this incident, I am looking for how God thinks. He has said His thoughts are different from mine, and I wish to correct that. Because He said I have the mind of Christ, it is my desire to think as He thinks.
Then I look at how Jesus goes about carrying out God’s will. Jesus has already stated that He was not here on His own, but to do the will of the Father who sent Him. So how does what happened with the disgraced woman, the 2 men who brought her for for punishment, and those who were so quick to stone her fit into the way God’s will works?
For one thing, the Jews were governed by Law. It would seem to me that in this incident they had abandoned the procedure of Law and become vigilantes. They were quick to jump to the punishment, but where was the trial?
We are always thinking about what Jesus was writing in the sand. One thing I have never heard discussed is the possibility that the writing was not about each man’s individual sin, but about failure to follow the law--condemning her without a trial.
5. Notice that in the number 4 above I referred to the woman as the disgraced woman. That term sort of jumps the gun, doesn’t it. Jesus was on earth as the Messiah. He was here to offer the Kingdom of God to the Jews. This was an offer they would not accept. As Jesus was here to present Himself, even knowing that they were going to reject Him, He seems to me to be showing the coming era of grace. If the conservatives are mad--thinking this story is too liberal for them--my concern is that they are judging themselves. With the measure that you judge you will be judged. So I much prefer the GRACE scenario to the LAW. I prefer the MERCY rather than the JUSTICE. I am very appreciative of Jesus’ demonstrating the Father’s will. The woman would never survive her punishment. The 2 men bringing her to be stoned would never survive their own punishment. And the stoners--hypocrites as you pointed out in your post--would also perish. Because of Jesus’ willingness to accept our sins, to be the propitiation for us, we are not doomed to destruction, to an eternity in Hell.
6. As for your third bulleted point about whether or not the woman makes the wise choice--if there is any indication anywhere in the Scripture, I’ve missed it. It is easy for us in hind sight to see what her choice should have been. The question is even more pertinent, though, for me in this age of grace. Have I repented and become a true follower of Christ? Have I submitted to God’s will, placed myself in the hands of the Holy Spirit, and determined that I will with His help "go and sin no more"?
This story wasn’t written for the shamed woman’s benefit. It was written for my benefit. God, I pray that You move on my heart, that You increase the eyes of my understanding, that You teach me to obey Your Word. I pray that Your will, not mine, be done in my own life. Let my life be one of returning the grace, mercy, and forgiveness You have lavished on me to those around me. In the Gospel of John You have said that the things Jesus did, I would do--and even greater things. So I ask You, Lord, to make me like Jesus. Purify all my thoughts, the desires of my heart, my worldly ways, and the leftover habits of my old man, and help me to BE who Jesus was on this earth so that I can DO those things, even those greater things!
Cory, I’m sure this goes way over the limit for a post, but since no one else seems to be submitting, it didn’t seem like it would infringe on anyone else’s space.
We preach Christ and Him crucified!
Blessings in the Name of the Lord